View Single Post
Old 01-24-2006, 12:19 PM   #20
johnfowles
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: New Jersey U.S.A. ex UK and Canada
Posts: 4,846
Send a message via AIM to johnfowles
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by SilverHeels:
John,
I take everything you say on board but now the enlarged edit is 'fuzzy'. I agree it would make a great sleeve pic. Can you crop it, John?
OK OK I agree that in my attempt to simply resize the original very small jpg a fair amount of fuzziness inevitably crept in
I have now cropped the original and adjusted mainly its brightness resulting in this, which is as you can see the same size as the allegedly non-thumbnail original albeit after cropping it is now reduced from 480x360-17954 bytes to 404 x306:-

Note that this is still a relatively tiny file of only 10726 bytes.
I am now obviously curious to know whether Bru has bothred to check her other jpgs from that batch of shooting to see if the norm is around 1 megabyte (like her Lightfoot Trail pic) or the tiny 10 kilobyte of this example???
John fowles

If you're lookin' to get silly you'd better go back to from where you came
from
Just Like Tom Thumb's Blues
johnfowles is offline   Reply With Quote