Oh, Linda comments re:
....throng....
Oh,Linda! ,
I took your reply as a comment in general at first. but if you want me to run it, Just holler !
Quote:
|
I'd say Redwood Hill but I don't think the dot rule works here geo Steve.
|
So nobody goes off-track, I should tell u all right now the ....throng.... versus dots "rule" - lol... boy that dots rule chaffs me 2 lol - for a different reason - its meant to be a help - and allow for the very means by which you can submit an ambig and win it, otherwise, no dots, then it would be only the intended song that wins it, which of course is NOT the case now - ambigs CAN WIN IT, otherwise, - no fun !- its just meant 2 b help, but yes, answers must conform to if it unless
I am wrong... but for whatever song you've in mind for throng - reconsider what you think what works and what doesn't - the base data I've imported for the prog I run, for lyrics is:
Lighfoot! Wayne Francis site - I call it the "gold" site ! anyhoo - in so far as Wayne is correct, and Gords unusual lyrics spacing may not conform to your ears - which I commend u for using , instead of lookin up - we ought to revisit that rule anyway.... but by that std., throng and my dots are in fact correct - 2 help everyone on that -
use the dots that way I assure you - 4 whatever song you've found them in - there is one where it works - - I am not ruling out
any song at the moment- meaning
i am not saying it isn't redwood hill ! I assure you the dots are correct.
Oh,Linda,
if you want me to run this as your submission, I will, I wouldn't hesitate based on concern of the dots -
that I AM sure of.
OH - and Char - I am in processing songs as I write - your turpentine will be out in a moment. I commented on it in response to "tin" - think back to around 1963 everybody - pre-UA !!!!
Update - as you see, it is out now. More tomorrow
