quote:Originally posted by Cathy:
I think that's supposed to be = PRICELESS
At least, that's what the Mastercard commercials say.
agh, well, i was playing off the commercial parody clever post that BILLW made in another thread but this time i was doing the converse/inverse/opposite type thing
i've had lots of coffee so i'll take the time to explain my brain (well, THAT's not possible, lol) ...in this case the person (moi & partially poor Eliz
) unlike in the commercial, does NOT have the items, rather they have been destroyed or disposed of, therefore, the amounts are negatives (for non-mathies or accountants, brackets are often used instead of the -ive sign) and the list leads up to the ultimate loss which could also be equated to (-ive PRICELESS) but i went with the conclusion that we are now +ive WORTHLESS without our prized possessions...agh, maybe a bit harsh eh?
anyhow, if my original post wasn't confusing enough, i'm sure this explanatory one should do the trick! lol
...i'm betting JohnF follows my illogic
ps) great hunting Aime_41, does it show Markel's sketch?